Monday, May 31, 2021

Premier 15s final: Harlequins' Shaunagh Brown calls out women's rugby doubters

Harlequins prop Shaunagh Brown calls out those who say "women's rugby is not good enough" after her side beat Saracens to win a first Premier 15s title in a thrilling Kingsholm final.

Original source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/57302198

https://therugbystore.com.au/premier-15s-final-harlequins-shaunagh-brown-calls-out-womens-rugby-doubters/

The Brumbies have a perception issue only they can address

It was the moment the Brumbies had to realise they have a problem.

No matter how much work they’d been doing in the week leading up to the match with the Blues, trying to find the improvements they desperately needed to spark their trans-Tasman campaign, it had to have dawned on them that something bigger was an issue.

Fourteen minutes in, having pinched a Blues lineout throw on halfway just a minute earlier, the Brumbies had a lineout throw roughly 30 metres out from their line on the south-western corner of Eden Park.

Lock Darcy Swain jumped at number four in a five-man set-up, lifted quickly and cleanly by Allan Ala’alatoa behind him and ex-Western Force backrower Henry Stowers in front. Swain took the somewhat-contested ball at the top and was looking to initiate transfer of the ball to Tom Cusack as he came back to earth.

Simultaneously as Swain’s feet hit the ground, the lifters and Nick Frost had already formed the maul around Cusack as he took the ball cleanly. The maul edged forward about five metres, and just as hooker Connal McInerney arrived to join behind Cusack, referee Damon Murphy let rip with the whistle.

The Brumbies forwards all then switched their faces to stunned, as they realised Murphy was pointing to the Blues.

“Long-arm transfer. You must stay connected,” he said, pointing to one of the Brumbies forwards. “Stay connected to the lifter,” he added.

Cue silence in the Sky Sport commentary box.

“I have no idea what that means,” the special comments man said, a former Blues forward whose name escapes me. Not James Parsons, the other bloke.

“I don’t think Darcy Swain does either, the way he’s shaking his head,” lead commentator Rikki Swannell added. “Technical penalty to the Blues.”

darcy-swain-lineout-755x515.jpg

Darcy Swain. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Dan McKellar’s face gave nothing away as they cut to the shot of the coaches box, while beside him, Laurie Fisher’s ever-present Brumbies bucket hat did just enough to cover his eyes as his face remains motionless.

The Brumbies walked back the required ten metres, and Swain could be seen saying something to his teammates as he shook his head again.

“Long-arm transfer,” Murphy said again.

Otere Black kicked to the corner, Kurt Eklund found Josh Goodhue in the middle of the Blues maul, they drove forward a few metres, and Eklund got his hands on the ball before barging over for the first try of the match.

Except Goodhue fluffed his transfer even worse than Swain did. As the Blues’ forwards formed the maul around him, he was still coming down, and so his arms carrying the ball ended up on top of the maul.

When Eklund took the ball from Goodhue, he wasn’t in any way attached to anybody in the maul.

If Swain was rightly pinged for the long-arm transfer – and I’ll get onto this – then Goodhue’s was even worse.

Murphy didn’t see it that way, obviously, and worked his way into position to award the try as soon as Eklund got the ball down with Dalton Papali’i driving behind him.

But what is a long-arm transfer?

Well, for one, it doesn’t actually exist in the Laws of Rugby as a thing. There’s no mention of it in Law 16 around the maul, and there’s no mention of it in Law 18 around the lineout, either.

But it did become a thing in January 2016 in the southern hemisphere, and you will find it a law application guideline around the maul.

“The ball can be moved backwards hand-to-hand once the maul has formed. A player is not allowed to move/slide backwards in the maul when the player is in possession of the ball and the ripper needs to stay in contact with the jumper until they have transferred the ball.”

The key words here are “…and the ripper needs to stay in contact with the jumper until they have transferred the ball,” and with examples in the World Rugby guideline, there are references to long placements and transfers.

So even though Murphy told Tom Cusack, I presume, “stay connected to the lifter,” I think he actually meant that Cusack as the ripper must stay bound to Swain. And looking back over it several times while putting this together, I do think he got it right.

The only problem being that he then very clearly missed Goodhue doing exactly the same thing much more visibly only a minute later.

But this isn’t about refereeing consistency – that’s a whole other chapter, never mind a single column on a Tuesday.

No, this is more that the Brumbies have probably been doing this same thing for some time now, and one way or the other, it had been brought to Damon Murphy’s attention.

Dan-McKellar-755x515.jpg

Brumbies coach Dan McKellar. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

And whether that was the Blues having a pre-game chat, or whether the referees themselves identified it during reviews as a possible infringement to look out for, or even if it was opposing coaches raising the matter in weeks previous, none of that matters.

What matters is that Murphy had it in his mind to look for it, and suddenly he recognised it.

Rewatching the few lineouts immediately preceding the infringement, there’s a pattern too.

In the 13th minute, in pinching the Blues’ lineout, Swain offloaded to Cusack with extended arms all while he was still in the air.

In the 11th minute, Frost won a five-metre attacking lineout cleanly, but let the maul form around him before transferring the ball underneath bodies as McInerney arrived.

A minute before that, Swain won another attacking lineout around twenty metres out, and on review he’s guilty of a long-arm transfer to Cusack again, who like Eklund really didn’t look like he bound to either Swain as the jumper, or to the forming maul.

I’m not going to profess to know what goes through a referee’s mind, but it’s entirely plausible that what Damon Murphy saw in the tenth minute gave him the reminder to keep an eye out for what he then penalised four minutes later. And didn’t penalise again for the rest of the match, for what it’s worth.

Essentially, and even if technically they are in breach of the 2016 guideline, the Brumbies are more guilty of presenting the wrong picture to the referee. And this is where they can address the perceptions around the way they play.

The perception is clearly there. In Super Rugby AU, the Brumbies had the best lineout success rate, but were also the most penalised of the five Australian sides. Again, in Super Rugby Trans-Tasman, the Brumbies have the best lineout success rate, though both they and the Blues are in the bottom half of teams for penalties conceded.

In AU, Swain and Cadeyrn Neville were in the top five most penalised players in the competition.

The Brumbies did enjoy some scrum success against the Blues on the weekend, and even though Scott Sio was the most penalised player in Trans-Tasman coming into Round 3, their front row and scrum coach Dan Palmer have been working overtime in recent weeks to change the picture they’re presenting.

Up to the point they kicked off in the 39th minute and found themselves chasing – but not tackling – Finlay Christie for 70 metres, they were controlling this game well. Their second half and one minute let down what had been a strong showing to that point.

They now have a chance with two home games to save some face in Super Rugby Trans-Tasman, but the easiest way they can do that is by helping themselves.

They can’t control how referees perceive their actions, but they can control the picture they put forward for perception and refereeing judgement.

Original source: https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/06/01/the-brumbies-have-a-perception-issue-only-they-can-address/

https://therugbystore.com.au/the-brumbies-have-a-perception-issue-only-they-can-address/

The Wrap: Reds take their learnings to break Australia’s Super Rugby duck

Grammarians universally frown upon the modern usage of the word ‘learnings’ as a dubious pluralisation of a singular noun. Meanwhile, rugby players and people aged under 30 wonder what on earth a grammarian is and continue to use ‘learnings’ with gay abandon.

What is more interesting than arguing semantics over the evolution of language is observing the sheer number of times a losing skipper will trot out the obligatory line about taking learnings from this week’s failures only for his side to fail to remedy matters the following week.

The word is rendered valueless not because of grammar but because it rolls off the tongue like a hundred other rugby cliches without any accountability attached.

What is more interesting again is when a side like the Reds, thumped one week in front of its home fans, retreats not only to lick its wounds but to actually apply the lessons from defeat, addressing both their defensive frailties and adopting some of the attacking methods that worked so well against themselves to apply against their next opponent.

The Chiefs opened strongly in Townsville, bending the Reds in close and out wide, but unlike the week before against the Crusaders, there was far better connectedness, cohesion and execution in the defensive line. The Chiefs’ best shots were repelled and the seeds of Australia’s first franchise victory in Super Rugby Trans-Tasman were sown.

Over the next 30 minutes those seedlings sprouted to the extent that the halftime lead was 33-3; the contest, seemingly, was as good as over.

No matter that a chunk of that time was played against 14 men and then more again against 13; the Reds still had to get things right. With respect to covering for missing players, not all cards are born equal, and the Chiefs losing both Chase Tiatia and Damian McKenzie left them bereft of manpower and speed on the edges, which James O’Connor and Tate McDermott recognised and ruthlessly exploited.

For the first time in this competition, an Australian side shifted the ball around with pace and precision, and players ran hard and straight into space. It was all so reminiscent of what the Crusaders had done to them last week but, hey, that’s what happens when you don’t just talk about taking learnings but actually walk the talk.

The Reds’ breakdown work was far more effective. McDermott looked a different player with front-foot ball – and what about the manful 80-minute effort of Lukhan Salakaia-Loto in attack and defence? It was a timely shift with Test selection just around the corner.

The Chiefs were powerless to plug the gaps, and by the time parity in numbers was restored, like a chip at a trendy, modern Australian bistro, they’d already been thrice cooked.

As it turned out, while they might not have wanted or expected one, the Townsville crowd got a bonus grandstand finish, with the Chiefs, incredibly, working themselves back into the match to such an extent that at 40-36 they had a shot at victory in the final minute.

It could have been even more nail-biting; take another look at replacement halfback Kalani Thomas feeding the final scrum, facing towards his own goal-line and sending the ball straight towards his No. 8 and ask yourself why referee Nic Berry didn’t give the Chiefs one more chance from a free kick.

All hell would have broken loose, and Townsville of course is rugby league country, where farcical scrums are a dime a dozen, but this one made an utter mockery of rugby’s laws. Berry would not tolerate a lineout throw being made straight to the halfback or a 45 degree forward pass. Why should things be any different at a scrum?

One thing Berry did get spot-on was the first-half sin-bin of Tiatia and the awarding of a penalty try to the Reds for a deliberate slap at the ball. For reasons that escape me this is a widely unpopular law, with offenders and fans alike running the ‘but I was going for the intercept’ or ‘but what else was I supposed to do?’ defence.

Of course Tiatia and the Chiefs had other options. They could have scrambled more players across in defence, allowing Tiatia to mark up properly on his winger, or Tiatia could have used two hands in a genuine attempt to catch the ball, or Tiatia could simply have kept his hands to himself, and instead of conceding seven points and a yellow card, conceded five points in the corner and stayed on the field.

Reds-celebrate-755x515.jpg

(Photo by Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images)

Less convincing was the dismissal of McKenzie for what Berry, looking at a one-dimensional image on a big screen in a stadium, himself said, “It looks like he makes direct contact with the head”.

McKenzie entered the contact area at too much of an angle to make a front-on tackle, was always too upright and rose even higher at the point of contact. It was a poor tackle, and by putting himself at the mercy of the officials, with precedents well established, he can have no complaint in that made his own bed.

But there remains a wider concern that the push to lower tackle heights and minimise concussion incidence requires a more nuanced approach. That the threshold for a red card has been sharply lowered in recent times is one thing; note that McDermott was not only not concussed, he wasn’t even asked to submit for an HIA.

Asking referees to play judge, jury and executioner using questionable vision when something “looks like” a red card offence is another. It used to be easy to determine the intentional, violent or reckless acts that were worthy of a red card. Toni Pulu, Pone Fa’amausili and now McKenzie do not fall into that category, and the process as it sits feels uncomfortably fragile and inequitable.

Minimising concussion instances is a critical objective. But that should not prevent a discussion about whether a ‘one size fits all’ approach serves our referees or the game as well as it should. For as long as the current framework continues expect more difficult and contentious moments ahead.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

function edmWidgetSignupEvent() window.roarAnalytics.customEvent( category: 'EDM', action: 'EDM Signup', label: `Shortcode Widget`, );

While the Reds got the clean sweep off the table, it was business as usual elsewhere, with the Hurricanes burning the Force in Napier 43-6 through the speed of their transition into attack, a common theme throughout this competition.

Two examples illustrated the difference. Firstly, the kindest way to describe Force hooker Andrew Ready overshooting a lineout throw and then plodding after his opposite, Asafo Aumua, as he sped 60 metres to score was that here were two players who didn’t belong on the same pitch.

And while Tyrel Lomax cleanly stripping the ball from a Force runner was impressive enough, it was the speed at which the Hurricanes hurt them on the transition, with Du’Plessis Kirifi running away to score, that felt all too familiar.

Fans who braved the stiff breeze in Wollongong were rewarded with a highly entertaining match, even if the Crusaders were never troubled on their way to a 54-28 win.

It was no surprise to find the Crusaders down on intensity from their Brisbane showpiece, yet the instinct to support the ball carrier, inside and out, was still ever-present, resulting in some delightful flowing tries.

As has been their recent custom, the Waratahs managed a few nice tries of their own, Izaia Perese was again a real handful, and the message to fans must surely be that there is a good young side lurking not too far below the surface that will be worth more than a second glance this time next season.

richie-mounga-makes-a-break-755x515.jpg

Richie Mo’unga (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

In Auckland the Brumbies brought more intensity and a better scrum but still proved no match for the Blues, who controlled the match in the second half on their way to an impressive 38-10 bonus-point win.

The Blues of recent years might have dropped their bundle or froze at the prospect of grinding out 40 minutes to overcome spirited opposition, but buoyed by a thrilling try to halfback Finlay Christie right on halftime, this 2021 version went right on with the job in a very professional manner.

The returning Patrick Tuipulotu got more minutes than what he would have been expecting, but fans will have been delighted to see him roll his sleeves up to help keep the Blues in sight of one of the two finals spots.

In a surprise twist the Brumbies scrum found favour with referee Damon Murphy, but they were spanked at the breakdown, conceding turnovers at a rate of two to one. After a tough three weeks on the road, they’ll be keen to lift at home, but Rob Valetini can’t be expected to carry all of the load on his own.

The Leichhardt Oval hill isn’t exactly Queenstown’s Remarkables, but full credit to everyone involved for getting the final match of the round played yesterday under trying circumstances. Let’s hope that Queenstown, a tourist destination suffering badly under COVID, is rewarded with a match at the first available opportunity. It’s the least that they deserve.

Rieko-Ioane-Blues-755x515.jpg

Rieko Ioane (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

The Highlanders’ class edge saw them come out on top 42-27, although both sides came away feeling that the result was a missed opportunity. Missing out on a try-scoring bonus point, the Highlanders are now likely out of finals contention, although if Aaron Smith was frustrated at being denied that point by a couple of inches, he can take solace that his pick-up and transfer in the lead-up to Sio Tomkinson’s first-half try was of another world.

Meanwhile, the Rebels took the lead 15-14 soon after halftime and were well placed enough, if good enough. But instead of clinically turning the screws, two pieces of schoolboy-level ill discipline, firstly from Lachie Anderson and then from Jordan Uelese – seemingly begging referee Paul Williams to give him a yellow card – cruelled their chances.

With Michael Wells and Rob Leota their two best players, the Rebels rolled the dice and, instead of the usual loose forward sacrifice, elected to take Anderson, a winger, from the field. Flyhalf Mitch Hunt recognised where the space was and, ten minutes and 21 points later, the match was effectively decided.

aaron-smith-scrum-755x515.jpg

Aaron Smith (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

The format for next year’s Super Rugby competition is far from decided, and there is the feel of another trans-Tasman stoush brewing over the competition format.

Understandably, Rugby Australia wants to build on the momentum gained by this year’s Super Rugby AU competition and would be happy with that as the major component followed by some form of crossover competition with New Zealand.

NZ Rugby, backed by their franchise coaches and players, prefer a smaller domestic component, with the main course a full home-and-away combined competition.

Adding complexity is the potential addition of Moana Pasifika and the Fijian Drua, a ticking time bomb planted by Brent Impey on his way out of the chairman’s seat, which has the widespread support of everyone except the people whose job it is to actually find a way to make it work.

Do not be surprised if – behind firmly closed doors – this emerges as a key bargaining chip during negotiations.

Japan is also a factor – again, everyone wants to see them involved in some capacity, but like a game of rugby musical chairs, it feels like there are too many people circling the room and not enough chairs for when the music stops.

Rugby Australia will be buoyed by standing firm against New Zealand last year and emerging stronger as a result. New Zealand Rugby will believe that their ongoing dominance on the field entitles them to ‘senior partner’ status.

Perhaps the learnings to take from last year are that, once the posturing and preening are over, both sides know that they have no choice but to work together constructively to play to their combined – not individual – strengths.

Original source: https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/05/31/the-wrap-reds-take-their-learnings-to-break-australias-super-rugby-duck/

https://therugbystore.com.au/the-wrap-reds-take-their-learnings-to-break-australias-super-rugby-duck/

Sunday, May 30, 2021

Saracens 17-25 Harlequins: Quins claim first Premier 15s title and end Sarries' league dominance

Harlequins see off a late Saracens charge with two players in the sin-bin to claim a first Premier 15s title.

Original source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/57300669

https://therugbystore.com.au/saracens-17-25-harlequins-quins-claim-first-premier-15s-title-and-end-sarries-league-dominance/

Premiership: Harlequins 44-33 Bath - hosts win 10-try thriller to book play-off spot

Harlequins secure a Premiership play-off place with a bonus-point victory against Bath at The Stoop.

Original source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/57244199

https://therugbystore.com.au/premiership-harlequins-44-33-bath-hosts-win-10-try-thriller-to-book-play-off-spot/

The Trans-Tasman showed a glaring weakness in Australian rugby

Yes, the Reds beat the Chiefs – a win is a win – but it was won without the Chiefs’ star player, Damian McKenzie (red-carded in the first half) and with a 15 versus 14 advantage.

The first half scoreline of 33-3 dwindled to 40-34 in the second half after the Chief had the full 15 players but without McKenzie.

The 64 million-dollar question after the game was would the score have turned against the Reds if the Chief had a full team of 15 and with Damian McKenzie playing for the full 80 minutes? We will never know.

McKenzie’s absence actually gave a sour taste to the Reds’ win, but that is not to say they did not deserve it.

Despite that, unfortunately, my views on Australian rugby in general have not changed.

The fact remains that Australian rugby truly took a reality check in the last few weeks of the Trans-Tasman competition. The glory days of Australian rugby are now a very distant memory. Why is that?

Each week when I turn on the TV to watch a game, it’s like watching Aussies in rugby jerseys marching into the slaughterhouse. It was so painful to have to think the opening kick sets the stage for determining how many points the Kiwi teams would be planning to win by to embarrass the Aussies.

Nick McArdle and his panel of rugby experts on TV should just call a spade a spade. Just say out loud that we are simply not good enough. Not even close.

Harry-Wilson-Queensland-Reds-755x515.jpg

(Photo by Jono Searle/Getty Images)

All the provincial Kiwi teams are head and shoulders above the Aussie teams in almost every aspect of the game, especially the fact they can grind through for the full 80. Aussie teams are 40-minute teams and if they lasted the first 40, they will melt like butter towards the end of the second 40 minutes. It happened to the Reds against the Chiefs.

To be honest, there is nothing wrong with the quality of the Aussie players, they are as good, and many of them are even better than some of the Kiwi players with All Blacks experience. The fault lies with how they were coached and strategy and tactics to be used to confront each of these Kiwi teams.

As I said before, Australian rugby is one-dimensional, unimaginative and full of predictable tactics being used in every game when they have the ball in hand. Rarely will you see a sense of awareness for creativity and for individual brilliance.

Kiwi rugby is best exemplified by Damian McKenzie, Richie Mo’unga and Aaron Smith. They exhibit creativity and are always engaged in scenario-building with the ball in hand and are not hamstrung by having to play to script. They and other Kiwi players, especially the forwards, will force you to tackle them to the ground before they actually decide to fall with the ball. And you can see they would try to snake around and away from their opponents.

Whereas Aussie forwards, when they have the ball in hand, will invariably put their heads down and charge like a drunken bull into the opponent’s body. And our backs will purposefully run straight into the face of the opponent without making a real effort to find ways to avoid getting tackled.

As they say, insanity is defined as doing the same thing every weekend and expecting a different result on the rugby field.

The Bledisloe Cup? At this rate, the opening bet will be guessing how many tries the All Blacks will pile up on the Wallabies unless coach Dave Rennie can make the Aussie players think outside the box for the full 80 minutes when they have the ball in hand.

Original source: https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/05/30/the-trans-tasman-showed-a-glaring-weakness-in-australian-rugby/

https://therugbystore.com.au/the-trans-tasman-showed-a-glaring-weakness-in-australian-rugby/